They use similar types of arguments and conduct “experiments” in order to justify and rationalize their beliefs but come to different conclusions. Some ideas are accepted by many in the community (the globe is under a dome with the North Pole at the centre and Antarctica's ice surrounding the edges)-some by just a few (God put the planets and stars on the top of the dome as decorations for mankind).
The theories of why it is the way it is seem to change with every theorist, speaker, and attendee.
Even though flat bombs are dropping throughout the conference, I’m having a hard time figuring out what-other than Earth is flat-these people believe.
0 kommentar(er)
